The Rise of the Close Corporation and the Making of Corporation Law
Temple University - James E. Beasley School of Law
Berkeley Business Law Journal, Vol. 5, 2008
Temple University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2008-65
Who makes corporation law? The study of corporation lawmaking has been a lively area in recent years, but scholars have limited their studies by focusing on only one kind of corporation law, the law of the public corporation. This article takes a new approach to the question through a legal historical case study of the law of the close corporation. Corporation statutes in the first half of the twentieth century were crafted by legislatures to fit public, not close, corporations. Close corporation participants found the standard-issue mechanisms provided by these statutes unsatisfactory, however, and sought instead to organize their firms through private agreements among themselves. Such agreements were common, but courts would void them if they diverged too far from corporation law's statutory norms. This created a process in which close corporations adopted, and judges later approved (or disapproved) a range of agreements and arrangements designed to privately order the close corporation; in the end, this incremental back-and-forth produced a common law of close corporations. Only after the development of a common law of close corporations did legislators change corporation statutes to further legitimize close corporations' special agreements. This account challenges our understandings of how corporate law is made, for it shows that close corporation law was made not only by legislators, courts, and interest groups, but by close corporation participants themselves. This Article thus not only illuminates understudied areas of corporation law and legal history, it provides us a new account of the production of a vital area of modern American law.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 61
Keywords: corporation, partnership, close corporation, history
JEL Classification: K22
Date posted: April 13, 2008 ; Last revised: May 9, 2008
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.234 seconds