The Constitutionality of Civil Commitment and the Requirement of Adequate Treatment
Douglas G. Smith
Kirkland & Ellis LLP; Loyola University Chicago School of Law; American Enterprise Institute (AEI)
April 1, 2008
Boston College Law Review, Vol. 49, p. 1383, 2008
This article addresses the constitutional concerns and costs and benefits associated with civil commitment for sexually violent predators. In particular, it focuses on Washington's civil commitment program, the oldest such program in existence in the United States and, indeed, the only program in the nation in which the constitutional parameters of the treatment program have been fully litigated. From the outset, Washington's civil commitment program has been the subject of significant litigation and in large measure that litigation has defined the scope of the constitutional rights of civilly committed individuals to constitutionally adequate treatment. At the same time it has demonstrated many of the problems associated with such programs and provides an important case study in assessing their costs and benefits. The article concludes that, in addition to the potential constitutional concerns regarding civil commitment, the costs of civil commitment appear to outweigh its benefits and that increasing criminal penalties for crimes of sexual violence may be a superior alternative.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 48
Keywords: civil commitment, constitutional rights, cost-benefit analysis, sex offenders, sexually violent predators,
JEL Classification: D61, D81working papers series
Date posted: April 18, 2008 ; Last revised: December 26, 2008
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.437 seconds