Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1121198
 
 

References (28)



 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (64)



 


 



Are Investors' Gains and Losses from Securities Fraud Equal Over Time? Theory and Evidence


Alicia J. Davis


University of Michigan Law School

April 8, 2010

3rd Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Papers
CLEA 2008 Meetings Paper
U of Michigan Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper No. 09-002

Abstract:     
Most leading securities regulation scholars argue that compensating securities fraud victims is inefficient. They maintain that because diversified investors that trade frequently are as likely to gain from trading in fraud-tainted stocks as they are to suffer harm from doing so, these investors should have no expected net losses from fraud over the long term. This assertion, which analogizes trading in fraud-tainted stocks to participating in a coin toss game in which players win $1 on heads and lose $1 on tails, is problematic for a number of reasons. First, even if we accept this analogy, probability theory holds that as the number of trials (in this context, purchases and sales of fraud-tainted stock) increases, the lower the probability of being break-even. Second, though true that with increased trials, the likelihood of the proportion of gains and losses being roughly equal will increase, investors generally do not engage in enough trading activity to have a reasonable degree of certainty of reaching the expected proportion of equal gains and losses. Finally, given the variation in fraud-related gains and losses in each stock trade (i.e., the payoffs are not constant), the coin toss analogy is inappropriate. This study, using observational data and computer simulated trading data on 14 investor prototypes, sets out to test the conventional wisdom and reveals not only that undiversified individual investors can suffer significant net losses from securities fraud over a 10-year period, but also that large numbers of diversified institutional investors can, as well. These results refute the claims of fraud compensation opponents who assert that a diversified investor that engages in active trading should suffer little or no fraud-related net harm over the long term and that individual investors can protect themselves fully from fraud-related net harm by investing through mutual funds or other intermediaries.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 52

Keywords: securities fraud, compensation, simulation, retail investors, institutional investors

JEL Classification: K22

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 16, 2008 ; Last revised: October 30, 2010

Suggested Citation

Davis, Alicia J., Are Investors' Gains and Losses from Securities Fraud Equal Over Time? Theory and Evidence (April 8, 2010). 3rd Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Papers; CLEA 2008 Meetings Paper; U of Michigan Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper No. 09-002. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1121198 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1121198

Contact Information

Alicia J. Davis (Contact Author)
University of Michigan Law School ( email )
625 S. State St.
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
United States
734-763-2221 (Phone)
734-763-9375 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,175
Downloads: 237
Download Rank: 73,612
References:  28
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  64

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.265 seconds