Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1121373
 
 

Footnotes (39)



 


 



EMTALA: Its Application to Newborn Infants


Thaddeus Mason Pope


Hamline University - School of Law

April 16, 2008

ABA Health eSource, Vol. 4, No. 7, 2008

Abstract:     
The application of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) to extremely premature newborn infants has long been a source of concern to pediatricians and neonatologists. Preston v. Meriter Hospital is the first case to directly address the special status of newborns. In Preston, the Wisconsin Court of Appeals effectively narrowed the application of EMTALA to newborn infants, holding that EMTALA categorically does not apply to any infant born to an inpatient mother.

But the operative facts in Preston predate the Born Alive Infant Protection Act (BAIPA). In light of BAIPA's alteration of key statutory terms, it is prudent to comply with EMTALA obligations for all newborn infants anywhere in the hospital unless or until a good faith decision is made to admit the infant after its birth.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 5

Keywords: EMTALA, BAIPA, medical futility, Baby K

JEL Classification: K32

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 18, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Pope, Thaddeus Mason, EMTALA: Its Application to Newborn Infants (April 16, 2008). ABA Health eSource, Vol. 4, No. 7, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1121373

Contact Information

Thaddeus Mason Pope (Contact Author)
Hamline University - School of Law ( email )
1536 Hewitt Avenue
Saint Paul, MN 55104-1237
United States
651-523-2519 (Phone)
901-202-7549 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: www.thaddeuspope.com
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 916
Downloads: 92
Download Rank: 166,001
Footnotes:  39

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.688 seconds