|
||||
|
||||
EMTALA: Its Application to Newborn InfantsThaddeus Mason PopeHamline University - School of Law April 16, 2008 ABA Health eSource, Vol. 4, No. 7, 2008 Abstract: The application of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) to extremely premature newborn infants has long been a source of concern to pediatricians and neonatologists. Preston v. Meriter Hospital is the first case to directly address the special status of newborns. In Preston, the Wisconsin Court of Appeals effectively narrowed the application of EMTALA to newborn infants, holding that EMTALA categorically does not apply to any infant born to an inpatient mother. But the operative facts in Preston predate the Born Alive Infant Protection Act (BAIPA). In light of BAIPA's alteration of key statutory terms, it is prudent to comply with EMTALA obligations for all newborn infants anywhere in the hospital unless or until a good faith decision is made to admit the infant after its birth.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 5 Keywords: EMTALA, BAIPA, medical futility, Baby K JEL Classification: K32 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: April 18, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.906 seconds