SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (184)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

From Federalism to Intersystemic Governance: The Changing Nature of Modern Jurisdiction

Robert B. Ahdieh
Emory Law School



Emory Law Journal, Vol. 57, No. 1, 2007
Emory Law and Economics Research Paper No. 08-30

Abstract:     
At heart, this introductory essay aspires to encourage scholars who write in widely divergent areas, yet share a focus on the changing nature of jurisdiction, to engage one another more closely. From Jackson's study of "convergence, resistance, and engagement" among courts, Kingsbury's study of "global administrative law," and Bermann's analysis of "transatlantic regulatory cooperation," to Resnik's evaluation of "trans-local networks," Weiser's account of "cooperative federalism" in telecommunications law, and Thompson's concept of "collaborative corporate governance," a related set of questions is ultimately at stake: How ought we understand the reach of any given decision-maker's jurisdiction? What are the implications of increasing overlap in such jurisdiction? And how should such overlap be "resolved"?

With an eye to encouraging heightened engagement among the wide range of scholars attentive to these questions, I draw on the diverse set of papers published in a recent symposium on "The New Federalism: Plural Governance in a Decentered World" - by David Bederman, Bill Buzbee, Charles Koch, Judith Resnik, Robert Schapiro, Mark Tushnet, and Ernie Young - to explore potential elements of a modern conception of jurisdiction. I highlight four features as particularly standing out in the collected works: (1) A pervasive sense of complexity and an emphasis on jurisdictional overlap as a critical source of that complexity; (2) A perhaps resulting attention to dynamics of coordination in law and regulation; (3) Suggestion of a certain interdependence of regulatory actors; and (4) An orientation to dynamics of persuasion, rather than more hierarchical mechanisms of regulatory control. Individually, these elements represent interesting and potentially useful subjects of study. Operating in conjunction, they would seem to represent something quite new in the nature (and study) of jurisdiction, offering a framework for future research, perhaps particularly across the otherwise divided scholarly spheres noted above.

Keywords: federalism, intersystemic governance, dialectic, pluralism, subsidiarity, jurisdiction, complexity, overlap, coordination, dependence, interdependence, persuasion, rhetoric, international

JEL Classifications: D73, F02, F15, F42, G18, H77, K10, K33

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: April 17, 2008 ; Last revised: April 17, 2008

Suggested Citation

Ahdieh, Robert B., From Federalism to Intersystemic Governance: The Changing Nature of Modern Jurisdiction. Emory Law Journal, Vol. 57, No. 1, 2007; Emory Law and Economics Research Paper No. 08-30. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1121417


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Robert B. Ahdieh (Contact Author)
Emory Law School ( email )
1301 Clifton Road
Atlanta, GA 30322
United States
404-727-4924 (Phone)
404-727-6820 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 454
Downloads: 167
Download Rank: 50,902
Footnotes: 184

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo3 in 0.109 seconds.