Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1121427
 
 

Footnotes (119)



 


 



The Dialectical Regulation of Rule 14a-8: Intersystemic Governance in Corporate Law


Robert B. Ahdieh


Emory University School of Law


Securities Law Review, Vol. 40, 2008
Journal of Business & Technology Law, Vol. 2, p. 165, 2007
Emory Law and Economics Research Paper No. 08-28
Emory Public Law Research Paper No. 08-39

Abstract:     
In recent years, Rule 14a-8 of the Securities Exchange Act - first adopted more than sixty years ago to increase shareholder participation in corporate governance - has been the subject of a flurry of litigation, scholarly analysis, and SEC rulemaking. Most recently, following several years of debate, the SEC issued a significant clarification of the rule, reversing the Second Circuit's hotly contested interpretation of it in AFSCME v. AIG. For the most part, the debates surrounding Rule 14a-8 - including in the latter case - have focused on the scope of the rule's exceptions. This paper, selected for reprinting in the Securities Law Review's forthcoming volume of the year's top securities law articles, attempts to go beyond those exceptions, to suggest a fundamental rethinking of the nature and operation of the rule.

Specifically, the paper explores Rule 14a-8 as an occasion for what I have termed "intersystemic governance" - an embrace of cross-jurisdictional overlap and engagement in regulatory design and function. In its very structure, thus, Rule 14a-8 calls on the SEC to interpret and apply state law. Properly utilized, this scheme offers an opportunity for the development of regulatory norms that meaningfully integrate both federal and state values of corporate governance and shareholder participation. To this end, among other reforms, I propose a shift in the SEC presumptions applicable to no-action letters, praise Delaware's recent constitutional amendment to permit SEC certification of questions to the Delaware courts, and highlight various opportunities for heightened discourse. By means such as these, a more integrated - and ultimately more efficient - regime of shareholder participation may begin to emerge.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 20

Keywords: intersystemic governance, dialectic, pluralism, Rule 14a-8, shareholder, voting, proxy, ordinary business, no-action letter, certification, state law, AFSCME

JEL Classification: D73, G18, G38, H77, K22

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 17, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Ahdieh, Robert B., The Dialectical Regulation of Rule 14a-8: Intersystemic Governance in Corporate Law. Securities Law Review, Vol. 40, 2008; Journal of Business & Technology Law, Vol. 2, p. 165, 2007; Emory Law and Economics Research Paper No. 08-28; Emory Public Law Research Paper No. 08-39. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1121427

Contact Information

Robert B. Ahdieh (Contact Author)
Emory University School of Law ( email )
1301 Clifton Road
Atlanta, GA 30322
United States
404-727-4924 (Phone)
404-727-6820 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 889
Downloads: 195
Download Rank: 86,551
Footnotes:  119

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.329 seconds