SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (119)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

The Dialectical Regulation of Rule 14a-8: Intersystemic Governance in Corporate Law

Robert B. Ahdieh
Emory Law School



Securities Law Review, Vol. 40, 2008
Journal of Business & Technology Law, Vol. 2, p. 165, 2007
Emory Law and Economics Research Paper No. 08-28
Emory Public Law Research Paper No. 08-39

Abstract:     
In recent years, Rule 14a-8 of the Securities Exchange Act - first adopted more than sixty years ago to increase shareholder participation in corporate governance - has been the subject of a flurry of litigation, scholarly analysis, and SEC rulemaking. Most recently, following several years of debate, the SEC issued a significant clarification of the rule, reversing the Second Circuit's hotly contested interpretation of it in AFSCME v. AIG. For the most part, the debates surrounding Rule 14a-8 - including in the latter case - have focused on the scope of the rule's exceptions. This paper, selected for reprinting in the Securities Law Review's forthcoming volume of the year's top securities law articles, attempts to go beyond those exceptions, to suggest a fundamental rethinking of the nature and operation of the rule.

Specifically, the paper explores Rule 14a-8 as an occasion for what I have termed "intersystemic governance" - an embrace of cross-jurisdictional overlap and engagement in regulatory design and function. In its very structure, thus, Rule 14a-8 calls on the SEC to interpret and apply state law. Properly utilized, this scheme offers an opportunity for the development of regulatory norms that meaningfully integrate both federal and state values of corporate governance and shareholder participation. To this end, among other reforms, I propose a shift in the SEC presumptions applicable to no-action letters, praise Delaware's recent constitutional amendment to permit SEC certification of questions to the Delaware courts, and highlight various opportunities for heightened discourse. By means such as these, a more integrated - and ultimately more efficient - regime of shareholder participation may begin to emerge.

Keywords: intersystemic governance, dialectic, pluralism, Rule 14a-8, shareholder, voting, proxy, ordinary business, no-action letter, certification, state law, AFSCME

JEL Classifications: D73, G18, G38, H77, K22

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: April 17, 2008 ; Last revised: May 09, 2008

Suggested Citation

Ahdieh, Robert B., The Dialectical Regulation of Rule 14a-8: Intersystemic Governance in Corporate Law. Securities Law Review, Vol. 40, 2008; Journal of Business & Technology Law, Vol. 2, p. 165, 2007; Emory Law and Economics Research Paper No. 08-28; Emory Public Law Research Paper No. 08-39. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1121427


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Robert B. Ahdieh (Contact Author)
Emory Law School ( email )
1301 Clifton Road
Atlanta, GA 30322
United States
404-727-4924 (Phone)
404-727-6820 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 465
Downloads: 130
Download Rank: 64,041
Footnotes: 119

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo4 in 0.125 seconds.