National and Statist Responsibility
Jacob T. Levy
McGill University - Department of Political Science
April 16, 2008
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, Forthcoming
In this article, part of a symposium on David Miller's Global Justice and National Responsibility, I first focus on an area of disagreement: Miller's attempt to attribute to nations responsibility that I think ought to be generally attributed to states. I then sketch a theory that disregards nations more or less completely, and yet issues in a two-level theory like Miller's, sanctioning important differences between intrastate and interstate distribution. It is only like Miller's, because the distinction between states and nations is one with a very real difference indeed. Moreover, I think that Miller aims to build up the moral and historical prestige of the nation-state to make it a viable competitor with the claims of universal morality, whereas I will engage in a kind of deflation that teaches us not to expect contingent forms of political organization to instantiate great moral truths. But this results in an account that is perhaps more like his than either is like cosmopolitanism visions, whether egalitarian or libertarian.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 24
Keywords: nationalism, global justice, state system, national responsibilityAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: April 18, 2008 ; Last revised: April 7, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.328 seconds