Whose Airwaves are They Anyway?
W. Kenneth Ferree
The Progress & Freedom Foundation
January 7, 2008
Progress & Freedom Foundation Progress Snapshot Paper No. 4.1
Whatever happened to: Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech? In the context of broadcasting, representatives Anna Eshoo (D-CA 14th) and Tammy Baldwin (D-WI 2nd) are the latest to transgress, offering this year their "Broadcast Licensing in the Public Interest Act" (HR 4882).
Congressional critics of broadcasting often begin their attacks by asserting that the airways belong to the public. The Eshoo/Baldwin bill is no exception. But one must ask why these selfsame critics deem themselves better qualified to determine how "the public" would like its airwaves used than are broadcasters whose livelihoods depend on their ability to deliver content with broad appeal.
Broadcast licensees, after all, compete with an increasingly diverse variety of other media for a share of a highly fragmented market. As such they have an economic imperative to deliver that programming which will most interest "the public." Broadcasters no more need the government to tell them what that programming is than Macy's needs bureaucratic direction on the styles of women's shoes to sell. Divining what the public wants carried on its airwaves is therefore no more difficult than switching on your television.
If broadcasters really are to serve the public, they cannot be held hostage to the individual programming tastes of any one person or group of people - even if that group is known as Congress.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 3
Keywords: Broadcast licensing, broadcasters, Eshoo, Baldwin, Public Interest, broadcast airwaves, public programming, public affairs, public ownership, tv programming, television programming, commercial broadcasting
JEL Classification: D4, D40, D45, H4, L82, L5, L50, O38working papers series
Date posted: April 23, 2008
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.562 seconds