A Problem of Remedy: Responding to Treasury's (Lack of) Compliance with Administrative Procedure Act Rulemaking Requirements
Kristin E. Hickman
University of Minnesota - Twin Cities - School of Law
George Washington Law Review, Vol. 76, 2008
Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-17
In earlier work, I found that more than 40% of Treasury regulations studied are susceptible to legal challenge for their failure to satisfy Administrative Procedure Act rulemaking requirements. Given this finding, why is it that taxpayers rarely raise such claims? The article explores this question and focuses particularly on statutory and doctrinal limitations on pre-enforcement judicial review in the tax context and their role in further limiting post-enforcement challenges. Although the article proposes ways in which the courts could relax the limitations on pre-enforcement judicial review in tax cases, the article also acknowledges that the courts are unlikely to change course and that congressional action may be necessary.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 63
Keywords: Treasury, regulations, APA, Administrative Procedure Act, pre-enforcement, judicial review, Chevron, Skidmore, standing, ripeness
JEL Classification: K1, K10, K2, K20, K23, K29, K3, K34, 39, K4, K41Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: April 28, 2008 ; Last revised: October 12, 2008
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.422 seconds