Reforming State Consumer Protection Liability: An Economic Approach
Columbia Business Law Review, Vol. 2010
Northwestern Law & Econ Research Paper No. 08-02
84 Pages Posted: 27 Apr 2008 Last revised: 22 Nov 2009
Date Written: August 6, 2009
Abstract
State Consumer Protection Acts (CPAs) were adopted in the 1960s and 1970s to protect consumers from unfair and deceptive practices that would not be redressed but for the existence of the acts. In this sense, CPAs were designed to fill existing gaps in market, legal and regulatory protections of consumers. From an economics perspective, CPAs were designed to solve two simple economic problems: 1) individual consumers often do not have the incentive or means to pursue individual claims against mass marketers who engage in unfair and deceptive practices; and, 2) because of the difficulty of establishing elements of either common law fraud or breach of promise, those actions alone are too weak an instrument to deter seller fraud and deception. The most striking lesson of our analysis is that the typical state CPA - with relaxed rules for establishing liability, statutory damages, damage multipliers, attorneys fees and costs, and class actions - solves the basic economic problem that CPAs were intended to address several times over. The effect of this redundancy in solutions is that CPAs can deter the provision of valuable information to consumers and, thus, harm consumers. That is, as currently applied state Consumer Protection Acts harm consumers. This need not be the case. A few modest reforms would dramatically improve the impact of CPAs on consumer welfare.
Keywords: consumer protection, advertising, class actions, punitive damages, overdeterence, attorneys fees, fraud, misrepresentation, no harm, reliance, information
JEL Classification: D11, D80, D82, D83, K10, K12, K13, K20, K41, L14
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
It's Not About the Money!: A Theory on Misconceptions of Plaintiffs' Litigation Aims
By Tamara Relis
-
By Jill Gross and Barbara Black
-
Damage-Based Contingency Fees in Employment Cases: A Survey of Practitioners
By Richard Moorhead and Rebecca Cumming
-
Federal Administration and Administrative Law in the Gilded Age
-
By Gary Blasi and Joseph W. Doherty
-
Are State Consumer Protection Acts Really Little-FTC Acts?
By Henry N. Butler and Joshua D. Wright
-
Consumer (In)Justice: Reflections on Canadian Consumer Class Actions