Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1126269
 
 

Footnotes (152)



 


 



Student Evaluations of Law Teaching Work Well: Strongly Agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly Disagree


Arthur Best


University of Denver Sturm College of Law


Southwestern University Law Review, Vol. 38, No. 1, 2008
U Denver Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-14

Abstract:     
Academics in the fields of psychology and education generally describe student evaluations of teaching as reliable and useful. On the other hand, law professors often criticize them as unreliable and impaired by students' biases. This Article considers resolving these discrepant views by paying close attention to the various purposes for which student evaluations of teaching are used. For some uses, such as guidance for students in course selection, shortcomings of the evaluations would be of slight consequence. For promotion or tenure decisions, despite law professors' skepticism, schools should use the data to identify outlier instructors. Basing conclusions only on large numerical differences among faculty should protect faculty members from unfair consequences caused by students' biases, since the effects of biases (if present) are likely to be relatively small. It is also consistent with the modern consensus among educational researchers.

The Article also reports findings from analysis of a large number of law school evaluation of teaching forms. Virtually all of them use phraseology that ignores the collaborative nature of teaching and learning. They focus attention on the professor, with the unintended consequence of portraying students as passive participants in their education. The Article recommends revising questionnaires to have a balance between terminology that ignores students' roles and terminology that reflects them. With regard to other attributes, there are large variations among different law schools questionnaires. The Article documents those differences and identifies some that may be problematic.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 36

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 30, 2008 ; Last revised: December 10, 2012

Suggested Citation

Best, Arthur, Student Evaluations of Law Teaching Work Well: Strongly Agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly Disagree. Southwestern University Law Review, Vol. 38, No. 1, 2008; U Denver Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-14. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1126269

Contact Information

Arthur Best (Contact Author)
University of Denver Sturm College of Law ( email )
2255 E. Evans Avenue
Denver, CO 80208
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,807
Downloads: 281
Download Rank: 63,869
Footnotes:  152

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.359 seconds