Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1126966
 
 

Footnotes (239)



 


 



International Agreements and Internal Heterogeneity: The 'Two Chinas' Problem


Daniel Abebe


University of Chicago - Law School

Jonathan S. Masur


University of Chicago - Law School

September 17, 2009

Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol. 50, No. 2, p. 325, Winter 2010
U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 232
U of Chicago Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper No. 426

Abstract:     
Economists, legal scholars, and climate scientists have made a persuasive case that the international community stands to benefit greatly if the United States and China can be persuaded to participate in a global agreement on climate change. Scholars have thus focused on constructing regimes that will incentivize China to join such an accord. We argue that the extant literature and proposals fail to examine fully the Chinese Communist Party's (“CCP’s”) unique internal incentive structure, leading to conclusions and proposals that overstate both the CCP's interest in reaching an agreement and its capacity to implement a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Based on a careful examination of the unique role of economic growth as a means of political legitimization, we argue that the CCP has very strong incentives to reject an international climate agreement and, even were one reached, limited capacity to enforce such an agreement internally.

First, the CCP has created special economic zones in the eastern coastal provinces of the country and neglected the inland, western provinces. Such policies have produced rising income inequality, social instability and dramatic divisions between East and West, rural and city, and peasant and urban residents. High rates of economic growth in the West are of paramount political importance to the regime, and the CCP cannot take any steps that might endanger this growth. Second, the CCP suffers from an erosion of state capacity. Despite the fact that China is an autocracy, the CCP has surprising difficulty providing public goods such as environmental protection. Third, current quantitative forecasts of Chinese greenhouse gas emissions have improperly relied upon country-level data and incorrectly assumed nationwide homogeneity. In so doing, they have missed important East-West regional variations and are likely to have significantly understated the extent to which Chinese emissions will grow over the next decade.

Our paper highlights these problems, all of which are invisible to any analysis that treats China as a black box. We then assess the impact of this theory on a number of the leading proposals for international climate accords. We conclude by suggesting the form that we believe any feasible agreement must assume - one that involves massive transfers of technology from the United States and Europe to China - though we remain pessimistic that the relevant parties will succeed in reaching such an agreement.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 66

Keywords: China, carbon, dioxide, greenhouse, gas, emissions

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 30, 2008 ; Last revised: February 24, 2011

Suggested Citation

Abebe, Daniel and Masur, Jonathan S., International Agreements and Internal Heterogeneity: The 'Two Chinas' Problem (September 17, 2009). Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol. 50, No. 2, p. 325, Winter 2010; U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 232; U of Chicago Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper No. 426. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1126966

Contact Information

Daniel Y. Abebe
University of Chicago - Law School ( email )
1111 East 60th Street.
Chicago, IL 60637
United States
7738344164 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.uchicago.edu/faculty/abebe
Jonathan S. Masur (Contact Author)
University of Chicago - Law School ( email )
1111 E. 60th St.
Chicago, IL 60637
United States
773.702.5188 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.uchicago.edu/faculty/masur/
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,422
Downloads: 169
Download Rank: 106,023
Footnotes:  239

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.297 seconds