SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (303)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Tearing Fashion Design Protection Apart at the Seams

Lisa J. Hedrick
affiliation not provided to SSRN



Washington and Lee Law Review, Vol. 65, No. 1, pp. 215-273, 2008

Abstract:     
Two days after the 2007 Oscar Awards, manufacturers began selling replicas of the haute couture dresses worn by actresses on the red carpet. These knockoffs sold for a mere fraction of the six-figure price tags of the original dresses. Yet, in copying these dresses no royalties were paid, and no law was broken. Unlike in Japan and the European Union, in the United States fashion designs fall outside the scope of current intellectual property protections. Therefore, fashion copying is rampant with design pirates freely reproducing unique articles created by Prada, Gucci, and other design houses.

Complaints from the fashion industry about design piracy spurred the introduction of three congressional bills in the past two years, each of which propose implementation of protection for original fashion designs. Protection under these bills would essentially grant three years of copyright-like protection to registered designs. The Council of Fashion Designers of America fully supports these bills as the solution to the $12 billion annual piracy problem the industry faces.

Enactment of fashion design protection will completely alter the intellectual property landscape in the United States and should be approached cautiously. Without congressional attempts to clarify the terms of the protection offered, the protection as proposed in these bills will still allow design piracy to continue. Even with significant changes, meaningful protection will be impossible because fashion design is difficult to define and even more difficult to protect. If enacted, other industries, which are not currently protected by copyright, will likely clamor at Congress' door asking for similar protection. In the end, Congress should abandon this legislation because the expansion of intellectual property law will harm the industry the legislation purports to protect and likely serve as a model for meaningless and similarly harmful protection in other industries.

Keywords: fashion design, copyright, protection, H.R. 5055, H.R. 2033, S. 1975

JEL Classifications: K39, L10

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: May 12, 2008 ; Last revised: May 19, 2008

Suggested Citation

Hedrick, Lisa J., Tearing Fashion Design Protection Apart at the Seams. Washington and Lee Law Review, Vol. 65, No. 1, pp. 215-273, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1127190


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Lisa J. Hedrick (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,021
Downloads: 124
Download Rank: 65,807
Footnotes: 303
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.125 seconds.