Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1127684
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (321)



 


 



'Streamlining' the Rule of Law: How the Department of Justice is Undermining Judicial Review of Agency Action


Shruti Rana


University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law; University of California, Berkeley - School of Law

2009

2009 University of Illinois Law Review 829 (2009)
U of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2008-19

Abstract:     
Judicial review of administrative decision making is an essential institutional check on agency power. Recently, however, the Department of Justice dramatically revised its regulations in an attempt to insulate its decision making from public and federal court scrutiny. These streamlining rules, carried out in the name of national security and immigration reform, have led to a breakdown in the rule of law in our judicial system.

While much attention has been focused on the Department of Justice's recent attempts to shield executive power from the reach of Congress, its efforts to undermine judicial review have so far escaped such scrutiny. Yet the streamlining rules have had far-reaching doctrinal and practical consequences. They have led to chaos at the agency, where the emphasis in immigration adjudication has explicitly shifted away from reliance on standards and precedents towards increased reliance on discretionary, and often arbitrary, decision making. Immigration appeals have flooded the federal courts, nearly doubling the size of some circuit caseloads, while trapping the courts in a doctrinal quandary between competing duties of judicial review and agency deference.

This Article argues that if left unchecked, the Department of Justice's streamlining reforms will eviscerate judicial review, turning it into an illusory exercise incapable of restraining agency action. Not only will agency decision making become less rule- and law-based, but significant spheres of agency action will be rendered immune from judicial review, corroding the rule of law in our judicial system. This evisceration of judicial review is unwarranted and unwise. To help stem this erosion, this Article proposes more nuanced interpretations of deference and judicial review principles which can resolve the dilemmas facing the federal courts and preserve the vitality of judicial review over agency decisions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 67

Keywords: administrative law, immigration law, judicial review, agency, deference, discretion, federal courts, Department of Justice, streamlining, Board of Immigration Appeals, BIA, administrative decision making, refugee law, asylum law, summary affirmance, affirmance without opinion, immigration judge

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: May 2, 2008 ; Last revised: May 19, 2009

Suggested Citation

Rana, Shruti, 'Streamlining' the Rule of Law: How the Department of Justice is Undermining Judicial Review of Agency Action (2009). 2009 University of Illinois Law Review 829 (2009); U of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2008-19. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1127684

Contact Information

Shruti Rana (Contact Author)
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law ( email )
500 West Baltimore Street
Baltimore, MD 21201-1786
United States
University of California, Berkeley - School of Law ( email )
215 Boalt Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,083
Downloads: 338
Download Rank: 50,292
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  321

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.343 seconds