|
||||
|
||||
'Genetic Surveillance' - The Bogeyman Response to Familial DNA InvestigationsJules EpsteinWidener University - School of Law August 26, 2009 Journal of Law, Technology and Policy, Vol. 2009, no. 1, p. 141 Widener Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-47 Abstract: Familial DNA investigations are the inevitable and controversial extension of DNA identification and databasing. A DNA sample extracted from probative crime scene evidence may be compared to the national database of offenders and found to nearly match a person's profile but with one or more differences, excluding that individual as the perpetrator but presenting the likelihood that the criminal might be a near relative. Investigation of those relatives, and securing their DNA samples, has raised cries of Fourth Amendment violations and the specter of "genetic surveillance." This Article examines this controversy from an innocence perspective, as familial DNA investigations can also clear the wrongly accused. After analyzing such investigations in light of Fourth Amendment precedent, it turns to debunking many of the objections and proposes a set of restrictions that will permit the use of this process while protecting individual rights.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 34 Keywords: evidence, DNA, familial DNA, genetic testing, fourth amendment JEL Classification: K14 working papers seriesDate posted: May 8, 2008 ; Last revised: August 26, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.313 seconds