Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1129913
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (19)



 


 



Doctrinal Cross-Dressing in Derivative Aftermarkets: Kodak, Xerox and the Copycat Game


Rudolph J.R. Peritz


New York Law School


Antitrust Bulletin, Vol. 51, p. 287
NYLS Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07/08-24

Abstract:     
The short essay develops the concept of strategic parallel conduct by filling the old bottle of interdependent conscious parallelism with the new wine of game theory. The conduct underlying the Kodak and Xerox cases is taken as the example of a positive sum game that is better understood and more appropriately litigated under Sherman Act Section One as strategic parallel conduct than under Section Two as monopolization or attempts to monopolize.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 9

Keywords: antitrust, parallel conduct, aftermarkets, game theory, complexity theory

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: May 7, 2008 ; Last revised: June 1, 2008

Suggested Citation

Peritz, Rudolph J.R., Doctrinal Cross-Dressing in Derivative Aftermarkets: Kodak, Xerox and the Copycat Game. Antitrust Bulletin, Vol. 51, p. 287; NYLS Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07/08-24. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1129913

Contact Information

Rudolph J.R. Peritz (Contact Author)
New York Law School ( email )
185 West Broadway
New York, NY 10013
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 757
Downloads: 136
Download Rank: 126,385
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  19

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.266 seconds