Testamentary Fragmentation and the Diminishing Role of the Will: An Argument for Revival
Kent D. Schenkel
New England Law | Boston
Creighton Law Review, Vol. 41, No. 155, 2008
Popularized by a desire to avoid the complexities and inefficiencies of probate, the now ubiquitous nonprobate system of transferring property at death brings a wealth of complexities and inefficiencies of its own. Our patchwork system of will substitutes, while undeniably simplifying post-death administration, requires more documentation, techniques, and tasks than ever before. On the positive side, our experiences with nonprobate transfer techniques revealed flaws in testamentary transfer laws that are now being addressed. But exposure of ancillary problems with wills laws is only a byproduct of the nonprobate revolution. If we are to reign in fragmentation and its consequent ponderousness and inefficiency we must admit that our aversion to probate, not wills, is driving the proliferation of wills substitutes. Ironically, the will, the instrument whose undesirable post-death characteristics spawned the turn towards alternative techniques, offers a simple and efficient mechanism for channeling a person's testamentary desires. The only significant impediment to reviving the will as the instrument of choice for this purpose is that wills carry the burden of probate. But because probate is now seen as largely unnecessary in many estates, legislation should focus on relieving wills from that burden.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 30
Keywords: wills, probate, nonprobate, will substitutes, estates, trusts, estate planning, testamentary, executor, trustee, personal representativeAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: May 8, 2008
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.485 seconds