|
||||
|
||||
Which States Have the Best (and Worst) High Courts?
Stephen J. Choi New York University - School of Law G. Mitu Gulati Duke University - School of Law Eric A. Posner University of Chicago - Law School May 1, 2008 U of Chicago Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper No. 405 U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 217 Duke Law School Public Law & Legal Theory Paper No. 236 Abstract: This paper ranks the high courts of the fifty states, based on their performance during the years 1998-2000, along three dimensions: opinion quality (or influence as measured by out-of-state citations), independence (or non-partisanship), and productivity (opinions written). We also discuss ways of aggregating these measures. California and Delaware had the most influential courts; Georgia and Mississippi had the most productive courts; and Rhode Island and New York had the most independent courts. If equal weight is given to each measure, then the top five states were: California, Arkansas, North Dakota, Montana, and Ohio. We compare our approach and results with those of other scholars and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, whose influential rankings are based on surveys of lawyers at big corporations.
Keywords: state courts, high courts, court performance Working Paper SeriesDate posted: March 10, 2009 ; Last revised: March 19, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.125 seconds.