Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1130856
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (194)



 


 



Intentional Sex Torts


Deana Pollard-Sacks


Texas Southern University - Thurgood Marshall School of Law

December 2008

Fordham Law Review, December 2008

Abstract:     
Intentional tort law generally protects personal autonomy and self-determination vigorously by requiring fair disclosure before consent to physical contact is considered voluntary and valid. A glaring exception exists relative to consent to sexual relations. Although American law historically has provided remedies for fraudulent or other tortious inducement of sexual relations, current sex tort jurisprudence offers virtually no protection. The law's contemporary caveat emptor approach to cases of sexual autonomy infringement is inappropriate because it departs from fundamental principles of intentional tort doctrine. In addition, the current law supports false norms that sexual misappropriation is acceptable. Current law fails to protect personal privacy, and fails to engage the law's potential to influence social conduct positively.

Intentional sex tort law should be reformed so that it is consistent with prevailing sexual norms and principles of intentional tort doctrine. Allegations of tortious interference with sexual autonomy should be analyzed consistent with traditional battery jurisprudence bearing on the issues of intent to offend and offensive contact. Exceptions to the defense of consent should also be adopted. The fraud exception should apply, utilizing established principles of materiality and justifiable reliance. In addition, the law should acknowledge a heightened duty of disclosure between sexual partners consistent with informed consent doctrine, to encourage honest and fairly-informed personal relationships.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 43

Keywords: Sex Torts, Sexual Fraud

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: May 9, 2008 ; Last revised: February 9, 2013

Suggested Citation

Pollard-Sacks, Deana, Intentional Sex Torts (December 2008). Fordham Law Review, December 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1130856

Contact Information

Deana Pollard-Sacks (Contact Author)
Texas Southern University - Thurgood Marshall School of Law ( email )
3100 Cleburne Street
Houston, TX 77004
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,443
Downloads: 182
Download Rank: 99,766
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  194

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.312 seconds