Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1131362
 
 

Citations (2)



 
 

Footnotes (159)



 


 



Taking Tort Law Seriously in the Alien Tort Statute


Anthony J. Sebok


Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law

May 2008

Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 234
Brooklyn Journal of International Law, Vol. 33, 2008

Abstract:     
This paper, which was prepared for a conference on "Corporate Liability for Grave Breaches of International Law" held at Brooklyn Law School, looks at the problem of identifying the source of claims for civil redress under the Alien Tort Statute ("ATS"). In the recent South African ATS case, the Second Circuit noted that the plaintiffs' ability to hold the defendant corporations liable for aiding and abetting depended in on the source of the definition of aiding and abetting. A definition based on the domestic law of torts (e.g. the Restatement) would have provided a more plaintiff-friendly rule than a definition based on international human rights law (e.g. the Rome Statute).

In this article I note that, although the Second Circuit was wrong in its particulars (it turns out that the definition of aiding and abetting in the Restatement is virtually identical to the definition accepted as a matter of practice in international law), the question posed by the Second Circuit is an important one to answer, since there will be circumstances when the source of the tort law in the ATS will matter a great deal. I argue against what I call the "two step" approach: the view that, once jurisdiction is established under the ATS, the defendant may be held liable for any tort that is causally related to the international law violation that created the jurisdiction. I will argue, instead, that there must be substantive alignment between the grant of jurisdiction and the interest violated which gives a right to redress to the plaintiff. I conclude by arguing that federal courts must take into account transnational tort principles when identifying the "tort" in the ATS, and that may sometimes produce rights to redress that are not identical to analogous tort claims under the Restatement.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 29

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 9, 2008 ; Last revised: September 27, 2008

Suggested Citation

Sebok, Anthony J., Taking Tort Law Seriously in the Alien Tort Statute (May 2008). Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 234; Brooklyn Journal of International Law, Vol. 33, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1131362

Contact Information

Anthony J. Sebok (Contact Author)
Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law ( email )
55 Fifth Ave.
New York, NY 10003
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 837
Downloads: 148
Download Rank: 116,102
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  159

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.281 seconds