Taxes, Patents and the Nuclear Option
Max Stul Oppenheimer
University of Baltimore - School of Law
Illinois Journal of Law, Technology & Policy, Forthcoming
Periodically, as industries discover that the patent statute applies to them, there are calls for industry-specific exemptions or special treatment, based on a perception that the patent system is ill-suited to the particular industry. The tax planning industry is the latest to encounter the patent system, and has reacted according to the general pattern. The reaction is all the more understandable in this particular case: while patent practitioners inhabit a world governed by a statute of broad principles and few specific exceptions, tax practitioners may be more familiar and comfortable with the concept of industry-specific rules.
The concerns expressed by those who fear that tax strategy patents pose a significant threat result from a fundamental misunderstanding of patent law. As a system which can grant government sanctioned monopolies, the patent statute includes significant hurdles to patentability to ensure that such monopolies are granted only in exchange for meaningful contributions to the public. Those hurdles are particularly well-suited to deal with tax strategy patents.
To explain why tax strategy patents pose no serious threat, this article begins with a brief history of the emergence of and reactions to tax strategy patents, followed by an overview of the U.S. patent system's objectives and methods. Then this article traces how a tax strategy patent application would be handled by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and, if issued, the rights it would confer on its owner. Although the analysis demonstrates that tax strategy patents are likely to be valueless, suggestions are offered for helping to assure that the patent system responds appropriately in evaluating tax strategy patent applications.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 35
Keywords: tax, patents, tax strategy patents, intellectual property
JEL Classification: A10, B4
Date posted: May 24, 2008
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.156 seconds