|
||||
|
||||
Computers and the Patent System: The Problem of the Second Step
Orin S. Kerr George Washington University - Law School Rutgers University Computer & Technology Law Journal, Vol. 28, 2002 Abstract: Why have computers created such a headache for the patent system? My argument is that the invention of the general purpose computer has baffled the patent system by breaking down the traditional one-step analytical framework of new inventions into two analytical steps. Unlike traditional machines and processes, general purpose computers divide the brains of the operation (the algorithm) from the brawn (the hardware). Patent law is ill-equipped to respond to this bifurcation. Instead, patent law's one-step conceptual framework forces us to confront an all-or-nothing choice between two unsatisfying alternatives: either we can grant computerized algorithms too much protection, or too little. Either every algorithm is patentable subject matter, or none are.
Keywords: patent, patent, computers JEL Classifications: K10 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: May 23, 2008 ; Last revised: May 23, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo 4 in 0.109 seconds.