|
||||
|
||||
Two Conceptions of Irreversible Environmental Harm
Cass R. Sunstein Harvard University - Harvard Law School May 2008 U of Chicago Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper No. 407 U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 218 Reg-Markets Center Working Paper No. 08-16 Abstract: The concept of "irreversibility" plays a large role in the theory and practice of environmental protection. Indeed, the concept is explicit in some statements of the Precautionary Principle. But the idea of irreversibility remains poorly defined. Because time is linear, any loss is, in a sense, irreversible. On one approach, drawn from environmental economics, irreversibility might be understood as a reference to the value associated with taking precautionary steps that maintain flexibility for an uncertain future ("option value"). On another approach, drawn from environmental ethics, irreversibility might be understood to refer to the qualitatively distinctive nature of certain environmental harms - a point that raises a claim about incommensurability. The two conceptions fit different problems. For example, the idea of option value best fits the problem of climate change; the idea of qualitatively distinctive harms best fits the problem of extinction of endangered species. These ideas can be applied to a wide assortment of environmental problems.
Keywords: environmental protection, precautionary principle, environmental economics Working Paper SeriesDate posted: May 15, 2008 ; Last revised: July 20, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.125 seconds.