Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1133513
 
 

References (26)



 


 



Who Should Appoint Regulators: Governments or Parliaments?


Pedro P. Barros


Universidade Nova de Lisboa

August 2008


Abstract:     
The last two decades were characterized, in several countries, by the creation of several sectoral regulators and of competition authorities. An important issue in their statutes is to whom regulators are accountable: the Government or the Parliament. There are several legal arguments in favor of one or the other solution. We focus here in a different line of argument: because who appoints the regulator may determine its objective function, Government or Parliament appointment will lead to different outcomes. We identify under which conditions each possibility dominates. Several factors contribute for the relative welfare assessment: whether the regulator acts as a perfect agent of the nominating institution, or not; whether majorities are strong, or not; whether parties are industry-friendly or consumer-friendly; and whether there is a dominating party, or not.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 16

Keywords: regulation, economic design, political economy

JEL Classification: L51, K20

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 24, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Barros, Pedro P., Who Should Appoint Regulators: Governments or Parliaments? (August 2008). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1133513 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1133513

Contact Information

Pedro Luis Pita Barros (Contact Author)
Universidade Nova de Lisboa ( email )
Campus de Campolide
Lisboa, 1099-032
Portugal
+351 21 383 3624 (Phone)
+351 21 388 6073 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://ppbarros.fe.unl.pt
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 376
Downloads: 85
Download Rank: 168,372
References:  26

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.360 seconds