SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (155)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

An Estoppel Doctrine for Patented Standards

Robert P. Merges
University of California, Berkeley - School of Law

Jeffrey M. Kuhn
U.C. Berkeley School of Law, Class of 2008



California Law Review, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
Technical standards, such as interface protocols or file formats, are extremely important in the network industries that add so much value to the world economy today. Under some circumstances, the assertion of patent rights against established industry standards can seriously disrupt these network industries. We have in mind two particularly disruptive tactics: (1) the snake in the grass, whereby a patentee intentionally keeps a patent quiet while a standard is being designed or adopted, and then later, after the standard is entrenched, asserts the patent widely in an attempt to capitalize on its popularity; (2) the bait and switch ploy where a patentee encourages adoption by offering royalty-free use of standard-related patents, and then, after the standard has gone into widespread use, begins to enforce its patents against adopters of the standard. We propose to counteract these tactics with a simple solution: over time, adopters of a standard ought to build up a reliance interest in the standard. Under our approach - which we call standards estoppel - non-assertion of a patent right in the presence of widespread adoption should create immunity from patent infringement. The fundamental idea behind this doctrine is to prevent strategic assertions of patents that exploit the logic of network lock-in. As we explain, though this is a simple doctrine based on deeply held common law principles, various gaps in the current doctrinal structure make this a necessary addition to the contemporary legal arsenal. In particular, standards estoppel plugs some dangerous conceptual holes in current rules relating to laches, waiver, estoppel, implied licensing, and patent misuse/antitrust. With this modest addition to the doctrinal fabric, patent law can more effectively guard against the risk of illegitimate leverage, thus more effectively fostering innovation in network industries.

Keywords: patents, standards, estoppel, network effects, lock-in, lock in, patent misuse, strategic assertion, laches, waiver, antitrust, reliance, bait and switch, snake in the grass, SSOs, SSO, network industries

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: May 28, 2008 ; Last revised: May 30, 2008

Suggested Citation

Merges, Robert P. and Kuhn, Jeffrey M., An Estoppel Doctrine for Patented Standards (March 2008). California Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1134000


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Jeffrey M. Kuhn (Contact Author)
U.C. Berkeley School of Law, Class of 2008 ( email )
Robert P. Merges
University of California, Berkeley - School of Law ( email )
Boalt Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States
510-643-6199 (Phone)
510-643-6171 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 905
Downloads: 191
Download Rank: 44,606
Footnotes: 155

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.172 seconds.