|
||||
|
||||
Evidence from Goodwill Non-Impairments on the Effects of Using Unverifiable Estimates in Financial Reporting
Karthik Ramanna Harvard University - Harvard Business School Ross L. Watts Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Sloan School of Management March 20, 2009 Harvard Business School Accounting & Management Unit Working Paper No. 09-106 Abstract: SFAS 142 requires managers to estimate reporting unit values to determine goodwill write-offs. Those estimates often use unverifiable discounted-future-cash-flows providing managers with more discretion than historically afforded in financial reporting. Ex post, managers can claim their unit value estimates were not realized due to factors outside their control, claims that are difficult to objectively falsify. In promulgating SFAS 142, standard setters assume managers, on average, use unverifiable discretion to convey private information on future cash flows; in contrast, agency theory predicts managers, on average, use unverifiable discretion opportunistically. We test these alternative hypotheses using a sample of firms with market indications of goodwill impairment. Our evidence, while consistent with agency theory, does not confirm the private information hypothesis.
Keywords: agency theory, goodwill impairment, fair-value accounting, FASB, SFAS 142 JEL Classifications: M41, M43, M44, M46, D82, G38, K22 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: May 21, 2008 ; Last revised: March 23, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo4 in 0.109 seconds.