Citations (2)


Footnotes (358)



Judicial Review of Legislative Purpose

Caleb Nelson

University of Virginia School of Law

New York University Law Review, December 2008

When modern American courts assess the constitutionality of a statute, they often investigate the possibility that the enacting legislature had hidden purposes that make the statute invalid. For most of our history, though, courts shied away from such inquiries -- not because the Constitution was thought to impose no purpose-based restrictions on legislative power, but because those restrictions were not thought to lend themselves to much judicial enforcement. This Article provides a comprehensive history of changes over time in judicial review of legislative purpose. Given the increasing prominence of purpose tests in modern constitutional adjudication, this history is important in its own right. But it also sheds light on other topics of interest to modern lawyers, including the proper interpretation of various seminal precedents, the famously murky doctrine of "unconstitutional conditions," and the ways in which uncodified norms of judicial practice can affect the glosses that courts put on the Constitution's text.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 102

Keywords: judicial review, legislative motive, legislative purpose, unconstitutional conditions, facial challenges, pretexts

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: May 23, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Nelson, Caleb, Judicial Review of Legislative Purpose. New York University Law Review, December 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1136125

Contact Information

Caleb Nelson (Contact Author)
University of Virginia School of Law ( email )
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,969
Downloads: 454
Download Rank: 40,948
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  358

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.375 seconds