Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (325)



 


 



Contrasting the Art of Economic Science with Pseudo-Economic Nonsense: The Distinction Between Reasonable Assumptions and Ridiculous Assumptions


Mark Klock


Penn State Law

May 23, 2008

Penn State Legal Studies Research Paper No. 03-2008

Abstract:     
In this paper I explain that law professors who claim to have proven that the stock market cannot be efficient have based their case on economic models contain hidden assumptions which are nonsense. Specifically, the assumption that investors have no wealth constraint and can borrow unlimited amounts of capital is nonsense. I further explain that the frequently touted claim that many investors are irrational is not relevant to the debate about market efficiency because when real world characteristics of financial markets are imposed - markets clear, budget constraints are satisfied, and investors face credit limits - markets will be efficient regardless of the mental capacity of investors.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 69

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 27, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Klock, Mark S., Contrasting the Art of Economic Science with Pseudo-Economic Nonsense: The Distinction Between Reasonable Assumptions and Ridiculous Assumptions (May 23, 2008). Penn State Legal Studies Research Paper No. 03-2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1136810 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1136810

Contact Information

Mark S. Klock (Contact Author)
Penn State Law ( email )
150 South College Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 562
Downloads: 120
Download Rank: 119,302
Footnotes:  325

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.703 seconds