|
||||
|
||||
Are Stocks Really Less Volatile in the Long Run?
Lubos Pastor University of Chicago - Booth School of Business; Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR); National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Robert F. Stambaugh University of Pennsylvania - The Wharton School; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) May 22, 2009 EFA 2009 Bergen Meetings Paper AFA 2010 Atlanta Meetings Paper Abstract: Conventional wisdom views stocks as less volatile over long horizons than over short horizons due to mean reversion induced by return predictability. In contrast, we find stocks are substantially more volatile over long horizons from an investor's perspective. This perspective recognizes that parameters are uncertain, even with two centuries of data, and that observable predictors imperfectly deliver the conditional expected return. Mean reversion contributes strongly to reducing long-horizon variance, but it is more than offset by various uncertainties faced by the investor, so that annualized 30-year variance is nearly 1.5 times the 1-year variance. The same uncertainties also make target-date funds undesirable to a class of investors who would otherwise find them appealing.
Keywords: stock, volatility, target-date funds, Bayesian, predictive system, predictive variance JEL Classifications: G12 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: May 26, 2008 ; Last revised: May 28, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo 4 in 0.235 seconds.