Abstract

 
 

References (15)



 


 



Rating the Law: How Financial Rating Agencies are Assessing the Legal Risks of Financial Transactions


Bertrand Du Marais


CRDP- University of Paris West Nanterre

Pierre-Henri Conac


University of Luxembourg - Faculty of Law, Economics and Finance; European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI)

Alain Piquemal


affiliation not provided to SSRN

Philippe Frouté


Université Paris X Nanterre

June 2007

LAW AND ECONOMICS OF RISK IN FINANCE, Peter Nobel and Marina Gets, eds., pp. 15-34, Schulthess, Zürich, 2007
U. of St. Gallen Law & Economics Working Paper No. 2008-12

Abstract:     
Financial rating agencies are key actors of financial markets. Their different ratings are usually pre-conditions for issuing securities or bonds. If they assess the financial viability of the financial instruments issued, they also assess the soundness of the legal arrangements used. Thus, taking the law into account is a key element of their assessment. At a macro level, their ratings may express an opinion of the economic attractiveness of a territory. The same may apply to the legal framework used by issuers. Surprisingly, the literature on this topic reveals to be scarce. This paper aims at fulfilling this gap.

It studies, in particular thanks to interviews, how rating agencies consider the law while rating a country, an enterprise or a financial structured instrument. One of the hypotheses we wanted to test was whether financial rating agencies use synthetic indicators of law and institutions effectiveness such as those of IFC (World Bank Group) Doing Business annual reports and if there are biases for or against certain legal traditions. Firstly, this study assesses the relatively informal methodology used by the rating agencies to assess the quality of the legal framework of instruments issued on markets. Secondly, the study reveals in particular the existence of several biases: a general prejudice against Case law and a specific bias in favour of Common Law jurisdiction. This study reveals that, on average, due to the limitations of the ranking used by rating agencies, all other things being equal, corporations or bonds issued from countries unduly ranked should suffer from this prejudice. The paper tries to quantify the sensitivity of rating models to the assessment of the quality of the legal environment. Finally, this paper considers what regulation framework would help to cope with the exhibited drawbacks and to improve the fairness and the effectiveness of the rating process.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 21

Keywords: Financial rating agencies

JEL Classification: G10, G28, K22

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 27, 2008 ; Last revised: August 7, 2008

Suggested Citation

Du Marais, Bertrand M., Conac, Pierre-Henri, Piquemal, Alain and Frouté, Philippe, Rating the Law: How Financial Rating Agencies are Assessing the Legal Risks of Financial Transactions (June 2007). LAW AND ECONOMICS OF RISK IN FINANCE, Peter Nobel and Marina Gets, eds., pp. 15-34, Schulthess, Zürich, 2007; U. of St. Gallen Law & Economics Working Paper No. 2008-12. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1137896 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1137896

Contact Information

Bertrand M. Du Marais (Contact Author)
CRDP- University of Paris West Nanterre ( email )
UFR SJAP
Room G301, Building G
Nanterre, 92001 Cedx
France
Pierre-Henri Conac
University of Luxembourg - Faculty of Law, Economics and Finance ( email )
162a, Avenue de la Faïencerie
Luxembourg, L-1511
Luxembourg
00 352 46 66 44 68 20 (Phone)
00 352 46 66 44 68 11 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://fdef.uni.lu/
European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI)
c/o ECARES ULB CP 114
B-1050 Brussels
Belgium
HOME PAGE: http://http:/www.ecgi.org
Alain Piquemal
affiliation not provided to SSRN
Philippe Frouté
University of Paris 10 Nanterre ( email )
200, avenue de la République
Room G301, Building G
Nanterre, 92001
France
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 782
Downloads: 206
Download Rank: 73,288
References:  15

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.828 seconds