References (54)


Citations (1)



Vertical Integration During the Hollywood Studio Era

F. Andrew Hanssen

Clemson University

May 30, 2008

The Hollywood "studio system" - with production, distribution, and exhibition vertically integrated - flourished from the late teens until 1948, when the U.S. Supreme Court issued its famous Paramount decision. The Paramount consent decrees required the divestiture of affiliated theater chains and the abandonment of a number of vertical practices. Although many of the banned practices have since been posited to have increased efficiency, an efficiency-enhancing rationale for ownership of theater chains has not been developed. This paper explores the hypothesis that theater chain ownership promoted efficient ex post adjustment in the length of film runs. Post-contractual run length adjustments are desirable because demand for a given film is not revealed until the film is actually exhibited. To test the hypothesis, the paper employs a unique data set of cinema booking sheets. It finds that run lengths for releases by vertically integrated (into exhibition) film producers were significantly - economically and statistically - more likely to be altered ex post. The paper also discusses additional contractual practices intended to promote flexibility in run lengths, some of which were instituted following the Paramount divestitures.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 48

Keywords: vertical information, contracting, vertical restraints, motion pictures

JEL Classification: D2, D4, D8, G3, K2, L1, L2, L4, L8

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: June 1, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Hanssen, F. Andrew, Vertical Integration During the Hollywood Studio Era (May 30, 2008). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1139383 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1139383

Contact Information

F. Hanssen (Contact Author)
Clemson University ( email )
Clemson, SC 29634
United States
864-656-5474 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,074
Downloads: 259
Download Rank: 78,990
References:  54
Citations:  1

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.391 seconds