Relational Contract and Other Models of Marriage
McGill University - Faculty of Law
Osgoode Hall Law Journal, Vol. 40, p. 1, 2002
This article proposes relational contract as a model for analyzing marriage under Canadian law. In contrast, in Bracklow v. Bracklow, the Supreme Court of Canada recognized two "competing" models of marriage and three models of spousal support. The difficult policy issues in the law of spousal support relate not to a tension between different models but instead go to compensation, including reliance and expectations. This article uses relational contract to critique Bracklow, considering the challenges in defining models. The Court's basic social obligation model and its non-compensatory support are unjustifiably broad, and its compensatory support is too narrow. In assessing the extent to which competing models give couples flexibility in customizing their relationships, the article discerns in Bracklow the emergence of new notions of public order in the sphere of marriage and a sense of not only procedural, but also substantive, justice.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 48
Keywords: marriage, divorce, family law, relational contract, Bracklow, Canada
JEL Classification: K12, K19, K30, K39Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: June 6, 2008
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.953 seconds