Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1142943
 
 

Footnotes (3)



 


 



Invasions of Conscience and Faked Apologies


Stephanos Bibas


University of Pennsylvania Law School


U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 08-25
in Criminal Law Conversations, 2009

Abstract:     
This comment responds to an essay by Jeffrie Murphy, which powerfully notes the limitations and dangers of using remorse and apology as metrics for punishment. But the state is more justified in teaching lessons than Murphy suggests, and retributivism ought to make more room for victim vindication and satisfaction. Gauging sincerity, while difficult, is not impossible. In the end, Murphy offers strong reasons to be cautious. But a humane society ought to be more willing to take chances and, having punished, to forgive.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 3

Keywords: Remorse, apology, forgiveness, mercy, clemency, pardon, parole, sentencing, criminal procedure, criminal justice

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 11, 2008 ; Last revised: April 10, 2009

Suggested Citation

Bibas, Stephanos, Invasions of Conscience and Faked Apologies. U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 08-25; in Criminal Law Conversations, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1142943

Contact Information

Stephanos Bibas (Contact Author)
University of Pennsylvania Law School ( email )
3501 Sansom Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
215-746-2297 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.upenn.edu/cf/faculty/sbibas/
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 745
Downloads: 91
Download Rank: 161,358
Footnotes:  3

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.281 seconds