|
||||
|
||||
Invasions of Conscience and Faked ApologiesStephanos BibasUniversity of Pennsylvania Law School U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 08-25 in Criminal Law Conversations, 2009 Abstract: This comment responds to an essay by Jeffrie Murphy, which powerfully notes the limitations and dangers of using remorse and apology as metrics for punishment. But the state is more justified in teaching lessons than Murphy suggests, and retributivism ought to make more room for victim vindication and satisfaction. Gauging sincerity, while difficult, is not impossible. In the end, Murphy offers strong reasons to be cautious. But a humane society ought to be more willing to take chances and, having punished, to forgive.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 3 Keywords: Remorse, apology, forgiveness, mercy, clemency, pardon, parole, sentencing, criminal procedure, criminal justice Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: June 11, 2008 ; Last revised: April 10, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.344 seconds