Exclusive Handset Prohibitions: Should the FCC Kill the Goose that Laid the Golden iPhone?
Barbara S. Esbin
Berin Michael Szoka
Progress & Freedom Foundation Progress on Point Paper, Vol. 15, No. 8, 2008
My colleague Barbara Esbin and I address a petition filed by the Rural Cellular Association (RCA) asking the FCC to prohibit exclusive arrangements between wireless handset producers and carriers. The RCA petition claims that large wireless companies have an unfair market advantage by giving their customers exclusive access to certain advanced smart phones, such as the Apple/AT&T iPhone - and that this anticompetitive practice is harmful to rural consumers served by RCA members.
We debunk RCA's arguments premised on a supposed lack of competition in wireless markets. We also explain the virtues - or at least, the practical necessity - of exclusivity: such arrangements ultimately benefit all consumers by allowing handset manufacturers (i) to fund expensive development efforts for new mobile products through revenue-sharing and (ii) to develop truly innovative devices by ensuring that new services function properly on the provider's network.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 10
Keywords: FCC, iphone, communications, exclusive, progress and freedom foundation, handset, wireless, internet, apple, at&t, smart phone
Date posted: June 16, 2008
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.187 seconds