The Fact-Conjecture Framework in U.S. Libel Law: Four Problems

Brian C. Murchison

Washington and Lee University - School of Law


Media and Arts Law Review, Vol. 13, 2008

A requirement of U.S. defamation law is that an actionable statement be factual in nature, but courts since Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co., 497 U.S. 1 (1990), have had considerable difficulty in distinguishing factual from non-factual statements and in articulating the value of non-factual public discourse in all its diversity. This Article reviews four topics - intent, context, conjecture, and hyperbole - that have been particularly troublesome to courts. It argues for a fresh appraisal of Justice Brennan's dissenting opinion in Milkovich and brings into the conversation the works of several current political theorists on the contributions of passionate political rhetoric. Noting a tendency by some courts to make unfounded assumptions about the good or bad faith of speakers, the Article advocates Justice Brennan's formulation: that courts emphasize the reasonable reader's understanding of the meaning intended by the speaker. The Article next argues that such an approach may have clarified the treatment of social context in Moldea v. New York Times Co. and provided a framework for analyzing conjecture in the recent Hatfill litigation. Finally, the Article stresses the need for courts not to downplay but to affirm the value of hyperbolic speech as a component of democratic discourse on public issues of vital concern.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 47

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: June 18, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Murchison, Brian C., The Fact-Conjecture Framework in U.S. Libel Law: Four Problems (2008). Media and Arts Law Review, Vol. 13, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1146595

Contact Information

Brian C. Murchison (Contact Author)
Washington and Lee University - School of Law ( email )
Lexington, VA 24450
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 989
Downloads: 102
Download Rank: 198,500

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 2.500 seconds