|
||||
|
||||
Comments on Coherence Theory in the Philosophy of LawWilliam A. EdmundsonGeorgia State University College of Law May 1994 Abstract: Coherentism, in philosophy generally, is of either an epistemological or a metaphysical type. The epistemological type responds to worries about foundationalism that have no serious counterpart within the philosophy of law. The metaphysical type is implausible generally, but has been put to use within the philosophy of law - by Ronald Dworkin in particular - to close up "gaps" in the law that provide an opening for purportedly worrisome exercises of judicial discretion. These remarks conclude with the suggestion that the conception of political legitimacy that underlies such worries is crude and unwarranted.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 10 Keywords: coherence, coherentism, foundationalism, correspondence theory, Joseph Raz, Ronald Dworkin JEL Classification: K00 working papers seriesDate posted: June 18, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.578 seconds