SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (12)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Comments on Coherence Theory in the Philosophy of Law

William A. Edmundson
Georgia State University


May 1994


Abstract:     
Coherentism, in philosophy generally, is of either an epistemological or a metaphysical type. The epistemological type responds to worries about foundationalism that have no serious counterpart within the philosophy of law. The metaphysical type is implausible generally, but has been put to use within the philosophy of law - by Ronald Dworkin in particular - to close up "gaps" in the law that provide an opening for purportedly worrisome exercises of judicial discretion. These remarks conclude with the suggestion that the conception of political legitimacy that underlies such worries is crude and unwarranted.

Keywords: coherence, coherentism, foundationalism, correspondence theory, Joseph Raz, Ronald Dworkin

JEL Classifications: K00

Working Paper Series

Date posted: June 18, 2008 ; Last revised: September 09, 2008

Suggested Citation

Edmundson, William A., Comments on Coherence Theory in the Philosophy of Law (May 1994). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1147392


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

William A. Edmundson (Contact Author)
Georgia State University ( email )
P.O. Box 4037
Urban Life Building, Room 402 140 Decatur Street
Atlanta, GA 30302-4037
United States
404-413-9167 (Phone)
404-413-9225 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://law.gsu.edu/wedmundson/
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 313
Downloads: 75
Download Rank: 95,755
Footnotes: 12

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo 4 in 0.125 seconds.