Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1147506
 


 



Unlawful Enemy Combatant : Status, Theory of Culpability, or Neither?


Mark David Max Maxwell


affiliation not provided to SSRN

Sean Watts


Creighton University School of Law

March 2007

Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 5, Issue 1, pp. 19-25, 2007

Abstract:     
The Military Commissions Act of 2006 represents the United States most recent effort to establish a forum to try detainees captured in its Global War on Terrorism . This article briefly explores the Act's use of the term unlawful enemy combatant to define both subject matter jurisdiction as well as the potential source of criminal liability. The article highlights the term's absence from the positive law of war as well as confusion over its legal significance in United States domestic law. Examining the relationship between status and protections under the law of war, the authors conclude the Act's use of the term unlawful enemy combatant reflects legal convenience more than an objective assessment of the existing laws and customs of war.

Accepted Paper Series





Not Available For Download

Date posted: June 18, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Maxwell, Mark David Max and Watts, Sean, Unlawful Enemy Combatant : Status, Theory of Culpability, or Neither? (March 2007). Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 5, Issue 1, pp. 19-25, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1147506 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mql100

Contact Information

Mark David Max Maxwell (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN
No Address Available
Sean Watts
Creighton University School of Law ( email )
2500 California Plaza
Omaha, NE 68178
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 254

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.266 seconds