Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1147764
 
 

Footnotes (414)



 


 



Leaving the Chisholm Trail: The Eleventh Amendment and the Background Principle of Strict Construction


Kurt T. Lash


University of Illinois College of Law

June 1, 2008

50 William & Mary Law Review 1577 (2009)

Abstract:     
Most scholars and courts assume that the Eleventh Amendment emerged from a sudden 'shocked' public reaction to the Supreme Court's decision in Chisholm v. Georgia. The Supreme Court's decision in Hans v. Louisiana has been subject to particular criticism for extending the doctrine of sovereign immunity beyond the text of the amendment and the particular subject matter before the Court in Chisholm. This article contends that the modern emphasis on Chisholm v. Georgia as the generative source of the Eleventh Amendment is historically incorrect. Public debate regarding the key issues behind the Eleventh Amendment had been underway long before the Court handed down its decision in Chisholm and the actual opinions had little impact on public discussion due to their being generally unavailable until months after the decision was handed down. The critical issue involved the concept of compelling a state to defend itself in federal court at the behest of an individual. That debate preceded Chisholm and would not reach critical mass until the state of Massachusetts responded to its own suit in Vassal.

All sides in this debate accepted the idea that the national government could invoke sovereign immunity against similar suits. Denying states the same immunity called into question whether they remained sovereign entities and retained the non-delegated sovereign rights and powers that Federalists had promised in the state ratifying conventions. More was at stake than mere betrayal, or even fiscal liability. Whether the states remained sovereign entities under the Constitution affected the basic rules of constitutional construction for, according to the Law of Nations, delegations of power from a sovereign are to be strictly construed. Allowing suits against states thus implicated the principle of limited federal power across all areas of delegated authority. The key to understanding the Eleventh Amendment is the text's focus on the proper judicial construction of delegated power in Article III - a demand that federal courts respect the retained rights of the people in the states and apply the background rule of strict construction.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 85

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 18, 2008 ; Last revised: September 30, 2012

Suggested Citation

Lash, Kurt T., Leaving the Chisholm Trail: The Eleventh Amendment and the Background Principle of Strict Construction (June 1, 2008). 50 William & Mary Law Review 1577 (2009). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1147764 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1147764

Contact Information

Kurt T. Lash (Contact Author)
University of Illinois College of Law ( email )
504 E. Pennsylvania Avenue
Champaign, IL 61820
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,806
Downloads: 219
Download Rank: 80,774
Footnotes:  414

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.312 seconds