Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1148298
 
 

Citations (5)



 
 

Footnotes (141)



 


 



Refugee Roulette in an Administrative Law Context: The Deja Vu of Decisional Disparities in Agency Adjudication


Margaret H. Taylor


Wake Forest University School of Law


Stanford Law Review, Vol. 60, No. 2, 2007
Wake Forest Univ. Legal Studies Working Paper No. 1148298

Abstract:     
In Refugee Roulette: Disparities in Asylum Adjudication (the Asylum Study), Professors Ramji-Nogales, Schoenholtz, and Schrag provide a comprehensive analysis of new data to document decisional disparities that undermine the fairness of asylum adjudication. The Asylum Study is an empirical project of remarkable scope. It examines patterns of asylum decisions at four different adjudication levels: at the asylum office interview, in immigration court, on administrative appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), and on petition for review to the federal courts of appeals. At each level, the Asylum Study generates empirical findings to support what we knew mostly by anecdote - that there are eye-popping disparities in the grant rates of asylum adjudicators that cannot be explained by the underlying merits of the cases.

What are we to make of these findings? One could derive an answer from a variety of perspectives; my response to the Asylum Study will employ two. First, I will situate the study within a territory that is noted but not explored by its authors: the work of political scientists who conduct empirical studies of judicial decision making. Second, I will examine the Asylum Study through the lens of administrative law, where we find a deja vu component to its findings. This essay has a dual purpose: to open a multidisciplinary window onto the Asylum Study, and to delve into the broader administrative law context of the intractable problem of decisional disparities in agency adjudication.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 30

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 22, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Taylor, Margaret H., Refugee Roulette in an Administrative Law Context: The Deja Vu of Decisional Disparities in Agency Adjudication. Stanford Law Review, Vol. 60, No. 2, 2007; Wake Forest Univ. Legal Studies Working Paper No. 1148298. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1148298

Contact Information

Margaret H. Taylor (Contact Author)
Wake Forest University School of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 7206
Winston-Salem, NC 27109
United States
(336) 758-5897 (Phone)
(336) 758-4496 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 687
Downloads: 122
Download Rank: 134,331
Citations:  5
Footnotes:  141

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.344 seconds