Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1148422
 


 



The Cost of Good Intentions: Why the Supreme Court's Decision Upholding Affirmative Action Admission Programs is Detrimental to the Cause


Leslie Yalof Garfield


Pace University - School of Law


Pace Law Review, Vol. 27, No. 15, 2006

Abstract:     
This article provides an overview of the Federal Courts' interpretation of equal protection challenges to affirmative action admission policies beginning with University of California v. Bakke through the recent Supreme Court decisions of Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger. The article then identifies and outlines the appropriate elements of a constitutionally sound affirmative action admission policy. Finally, the article concludes that the permissible policy is almost unattainable for schools other than small institutions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 40

Keywords: Constitutional law, affirmative action, admission policy, education, civil rights

JEL Classification: I20, K19, K39, I29

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: July 2, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Garfield, Leslie Yalof, The Cost of Good Intentions: Why the Supreme Court's Decision Upholding Affirmative Action Admission Programs is Detrimental to the Cause. Pace Law Review, Vol. 27, No. 15, 2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1148422

Contact Information

Leslie Yalof Garfield (Contact Author)
Pace University - School of Law ( email )
78 North Broadway
WHITE PLAINS, NY 10603
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 517
Downloads: 28

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.313 seconds