State Constitutionalism in New York: A Non-Reactive Tradition

Vincent Martin Bonventre

Albany Law School


Emerging Issues in State Constitutional Law, Vol. 2, 1989

This article traces the independent state-law based protection of individual rights and liberties by the New York Court of Appeals, the state's highest court, since its earliest years in the mid-nineteenth century. The practice of developing a body of state law and relying on it to decide issues concerning the rights of the accused, civil rights and civil liberties is as old as the court itself. This practice is not simply a modern mode of decision-making adopted by New York's high court in reaction to the conservative retrenchment of the Supreme Court in the Burger and Rehnquist eras. The New York court has been erratic in the development and reliance on non-federal, independent state-law grounds for its decisions in recent years. But such independent state-based decision-making in the protection of rights and liberties is, nonetheless, a longstanding tradition of the court.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 30

Keywords: New York Court of Appeals, state constitutional law, judicial federalism, Cardozo, Judith Kaye, Burger Court, Rehnquist Court

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: June 23, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Bonventre, Vincent Martin, State Constitutionalism in New York: A Non-Reactive Tradition (1989). Emerging Issues in State Constitutional Law, Vol. 2, 1989. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1148824

Contact Information

Vincent Martin Bonventre (Contact Author)
Albany Law School ( email )
80 New Scotland Avenue
Albany, NY 12208
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.albanylaw.edu/

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 510
Downloads: 37

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.156 seconds