Abstract

 


 



This Article Has No Footnotes[Fn1]: An Essay on RFRA[Fn2] and the Limits of Logic in the Law


Steven D. Jamar


Howard University School of Law


Stetson Law Review, Vol. 27, pp. 559-587, 1997

Abstract:     
This essay seeks to illuminate some of the limits of formal logic in a legal system through exploring some of the logic problems in the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). Religious freedom is perhaps uniquely apt for examining the limits of logic in the law for two reasons. First, religious beliefs are based on faith and non logical or extra logical precepts (though internal logical consistency is often sought once the premises are adopted). Second, developing a coherent, consistent, logical jurisprudence of religious freedom has proven to be particularly intractable.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 31

Keywords: RFRA, strict scrutiny, standard of review, freedom of religion, free exercise, constitutional law, law, rhetoric, logic, syllogism

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 22, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Jamar, Steven D., This Article Has No Footnotes[Fn1]: An Essay on RFRA[Fn2] and the Limits of Logic in the Law. Stetson Law Review, Vol. 27, pp. 559-587, 1997. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1148830

Contact Information

Steven D. Jamar (Contact Author)
Howard University School of Law ( email )
2900 Van Ness Street NW
Washington, DC 20008
United States
HOME PAGE: http://iipsj.com/SDJ/
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 459
Downloads: 43

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.328 seconds