Abstract

 
 

Citations



 


 



Judicial Conversations with Children in Parenting Disputes: The Views of Australian Judges


Patrick Parkinson


University of Sydney - Faculty of Law

Judy Cashmore


affiliation not provided to SSRN

August 2007

International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, Vol. 21, Issue 2, pp. 160-189, 2007

Abstract:     
In an article in the last issue of this Journal, we reported on a study of parents' and children's views about whether they would like judges to talk with children in chambers. This article reports on a related study of the views of Australian judges concerning the issue. It explores the reasons that judges gave for being opposed to or cautiously in favour of having conversations with children before and after making their decisions. On the basis of these views, and the views of the parents and children discussed in the earlier article, we propose guidelines on when and how judges should engage in ‘conversations’ with children in chambers if they consider it appropriate to do so.

Accepted Paper Series


Date posted: June 22, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Parkinson, Patrick and Cashmore, Judy, Judicial Conversations with Children in Parenting Disputes: The Views of Australian Judges (August 2007). International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, Vol. 21, Issue 2, pp. 160-189, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1149648 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebm005

Contact Information

Patrick Parkinson
University of Sydney - Faculty of Law ( email )
Faculty of Law Building, F10
The University of Sydney
Sydney, NSW 2006
Australia
Judy Cashmore
affiliation not provided to SSRN
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 174

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.359 seconds