Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1150168
 
 

Footnotes (36)



 


 



Unilateral Refusals to Deal and the Antitrust Modernization Commission Report


Keith N. Hylton


William Fairfield Warren Distinguished Professor, Boston University; Professor of Law, Boston University School of Law

June, 23 2008

Antitrust Bulletin, Forthcoming
Boston University School of Law Working Paper No. 08-22

Abstract:     
The Antitrust Modernization Commission recommends that refusals to deal with rivals in the same market should rarely, if ever, be unlawful. I will focus on the principles that should determine the legal standard governing unilateral refusals to deal. A legal test that is strongly biased in favor of defendants, as the Commission recommends, is desirable as a default rule and especially in cases in which the essential facility at the core of the refusal to deal dispute is efficiency enhancing. However, there is another set of cases in which the defendant gains control of an essential market portal. In these cases, a legal test that is less biased toward defendants may be preferable to the Commission's suggested approach.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 15

Keywords: The Antitrust Modernization Commission, essential facility, unilateral refusals to deal, monopolization

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 24, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Hylton, Keith N., Unilateral Refusals to Deal and the Antitrust Modernization Commission Report (June, 23 2008). Antitrust Bulletin, Forthcoming; Boston University School of Law Working Paper No. 08-22. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1150168

Contact Information

Keith N. Hylton (Contact Author)
William Fairfield Warren Distinguished Professor, Boston University ( email )
595 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States
617-353-8959 (Phone)
Professor of Law, Boston University School of Law ( email )
765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States
617-353-8959 (Phone)
617-353-3077 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 929
Downloads: 218
Download Rank: 77,117
Footnotes:  36

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.437 seconds