Abstract

 


 



Towards Federalizing U.S. International Commercial Arbitration Law


Jack I. Garvey


University of San Francisco - School of Law

Totton Heffelfinger


affiliation not provided to SSRN

June, 23 2008

International Lawyer, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 209-221, 1991

Abstract:     
This article addresses the question of whether the adoption of the UNCITRAL Model Law on Commercial Arbitration in the United States should be through state law, through federal law, or through some parallel of state and federal law. It argues that the law regulating international arbitration in the United States should be federal law, asserting that to the extent state enactment of the Model Law is pursued, it creates a federal-state duality in the law of international arbitration that significantly undermines the purposes of uniformity and predictability that the Model Law is designed to achieve, and gives rise to a variety of complex, litigation-generating problems.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 14

Keywords: international commercial arbitration, UNCITRAL Model Law on Commercial Arbitration, federalism

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 25, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Garvey, Jack I. and Heffelfinger, Totton, Towards Federalizing U.S. International Commercial Arbitration Law (June, 23 2008). International Lawyer, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 209-221, 1991. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1150431

Contact Information

Jack I. Garvey (Contact Author)
University of San Francisco - School of Law ( email )
2130 Fulton Street
San Francisco, CA 94117
United States
Totton Heffelfinger
affiliation not provided to SSRN
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 259
Downloads: 62
Download Rank: 182,646

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.563 seconds