Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1150780
 
 

Footnotes (182)



 


 



The Original Meaning of the Free Exercise Clause: The Evidence from the First Congress


Vincent Phillip Munoz


Dept. of Political Science - University of Notre Dame

2008

Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 1083-1120, 2008

Abstract:     
Despite the vast quantity of research devoted to understanding religion and the American Founding, the original meaning of the First Amendment's Free Exercise Clause remains a matter of significant dispute. In academic literature and in Supreme Court opinions, two leading interpretations have emerged. One side understands the Free Exercise Clause to grant religious individuals exemptions from generally applicable laws that incidentally burden religious exercise, absent a "compelling" state interest in the law's enforcement. The other interpretation of the Free Exercise Clause denies that exemptions make up any part of the First Amendment. In an effort to help resolve the scholarly and the Supreme Court debate over the most accurate interpretation of history, this Article gathers and examines all the relevant evidence available from the First Congress regarding the Free Exercise Clause's original meaning. Part I of this Article reviews the originalist arguments articulated by Justices O'Connor and Scalia in their competing opinions in Boerne. Part II begins the Article's review of the records of the First Congress. Through a detailed examination of the drafting of what would become the Free Exercise Clause, Part II shows why almost no conclusions can be drawn about the Clause's original meaning from those records. Part III examines the insufficiently explored drafting of what would become the Second Amendment, documenting Congress's consideration and rejection of a right of conscientious exemption from militia service. That Congress rejected religious exemptions from militia service and that it appears to have considered such an exemption entirely without reference to what would become the First Amendment, strongly suggests that the members of the First Congress did not understand the Free Exercise Clause to grant religious individuals exemptions from generally applicable laws.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 38

Keywords: Free Exercise Clause, First Amendment, Religious Exemptions, Freedom of Religion, Separation of Church and State, Constitutional Law, Originalism, religious liberty, religious freedom, church and state, American founding, James Madison

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: June 26, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Munoz, Vincent Phillip, The Original Meaning of the Free Exercise Clause: The Evidence from the First Congress (2008). Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 1083-1120, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1150780

Contact Information

Vincent Phillip Munoz (Contact Author)
Dept. of Political Science - University of Notre Dame ( email )
217 O'Shaughnessy Hall
Notre Dame, IN 46556
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,052
Downloads: 131
Download Rank: 133,205
Footnotes:  182

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.266 seconds