Abstract

  
 

Citations



 


 



Legal Originality


Mathias M. Siems


Durham University - Durham Law School; University of Cambridge - Centre for Business Research
Spring 2008

Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 28, Issue 1, pp. 147-164, 2008

Abstract:     
In legal academia it is highly controversial how to be original in legal research. This article will try to maintain an attitude of tolerance in not promoting or discrediting one particular methodology. Instead, it will identify four different ways of being original. Perhaps the most common approach is to deal with micro-legal questions. Many legal academics also pursue research in macro-legal questions. Less common but growing is the importance of scientific legal research and research in non-legal topics.

Accepted Paper Series


Date posted: June 25, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Siems, Mathias M. , Legal Originality (Spring 2008). Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 28, Issue 1, pp. 147-164, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1151104 or http://dx.doi.org/gqm024

Contact Information

Mathias M. Siems (Contact Author)
Durham University - Durham Law School ( email )
50 North Bailey
Durham, County Durham DH1 3ET
United Kingdom
HOME PAGE: http://www.dur.ac.uk/mathias.siems
University of Cambridge - Centre for Business Research ( email )
Top Floor, Judge Business School Building
Trumpington Street
Cambridge, CB2 1AG
United Kingdom
HOME PAGE: http://www.cbr.cam.ac.uk/people/siems.htm
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 474

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.766 seconds