Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1152312
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (204)



 


 



The Non-Option: Understanding the Dearth of Discounted Employee Stock Options


David I. Walker


Boston University School of Law

October 17, 2008

CLEA 2008 Meetings Paper
Boston Univ. School of Law Working Paper No. 08-30
Boston University Law Review, 2009

Abstract:     
Contemporaneous grants of both stock and at-the-money options to individual employees of U.S. public companies indicates demand for equity compensation packages that are in the money, i.e., packages of equity pay instruments that in aggregate have payoff profiles and incentive properties that are similar to explicit in-the-money employee stock options. However, several tax rules (and formerly accounting rules) strongly discourage grants of explicit in-the-money options, including recently enacted IRC - 409A, which essentially precludes the use of explicitly discounted options by taxing these instruments at vesting, rather than at exercise, and adding a 20% penalty tax. This article explores whether the tax and accounting distinction between discounted and non-discounted options makes sense.

The stated legislative rationales for rules discriminating against explicit in-the-money options are weak, reflecting a dichotomous view of equity compensation divided between discounted and non-discounted options, when, in fact, option design is a continuum. However, this article sets forth a novel tax policy rationale for forcing firms to bifurcate in-the-money pay packages into discrete grants of stock and non-discounted options, a combination that I refer to as a synthetic in-the-money option. In short, doing so precludes the unwarranted expansion of preferential option tax treatment to instruments resembling restricted stock.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 59

Keywords: Employee stock options, In-the-money, options, Discounted options, NQSO, ISO, Restricted stock

JEL Classification: H24, H25, J33, K22, K34

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 28, 2008 ; Last revised: June 29, 2009

Suggested Citation

Walker, David I., The Non-Option: Understanding the Dearth of Discounted Employee Stock Options (October 17, 2008). CLEA 2008 Meetings Paper; Boston Univ. School of Law Working Paper No. 08-30; Boston University Law Review, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1152312 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1152312

Contact Information

David I. Walker (Contact Author)
Boston University School of Law ( email )
765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,501
Downloads: 177
Download Rank: 98,382
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  204

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.281 seconds