|
||||
|
||||
Is Reasonable Doubt Reasonable?Larry LaudanUniversity of Texas School of Law U of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 144 Abstract: This paper analyses the multiple tensions and confusions in appellate-court efforts to explain the criminal standard of proof. It concludes that the ambiguous and highly subjectivist character of the Supreme Court's recent glosses on this conception render it virtually meaningless. It is virtually indistinguishable from a standard saying that any doubt whatever, even inarticulable doubts, can justify an acquittal.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 35 Keywords: reasonable doubt, moral certainty, standard of proof working papers seriesDate posted: July 1, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.422 seconds