Abstract

 
 

Citations (2)



 
 

Footnotes (60)



 


 



Is Reasonable Doubt Reasonable?


Larry Laudan


University of Texas School of Law


U of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 144

Abstract:     
This paper analyses the multiple tensions and confusions in appellate-court efforts to explain the criminal standard of proof. It concludes that the ambiguous and highly subjectivist character of the Supreme Court's recent glosses on this conception render it virtually meaningless. It is virtually indistinguishable from a standard saying that any doubt whatever, even inarticulable doubts, can justify an acquittal.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 35

Keywords: reasonable doubt, moral certainty, standard of proof

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 1, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Laudan, Larry, Is Reasonable Doubt Reasonable?. U of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 144. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1152883 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1152883

Contact Information

Larry Laudan (Contact Author)
University of Texas School of Law
727 East Dean Keeton Street
Austin, TX 78705
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,395
Downloads: 394
Download Rank: 35,114
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  60

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.609 seconds